Archive for May, 2009


Watch this trailer, for a remake of a series called V, about an alien species spreading “Hope” and “Change” as the guise for a takeover of earth.

While I seriously doubt that ABC would ever do anything intentionally critical of Obama, it’s no coincidence that the political rapture people are experiencing in the presence of the aliens looks so similar to the political rapture Obama’s worshippers exhibited. The original series, after all, while it exhibited a sci-fi twist with aliens, was about the political tactics of fascism. Like it or not, Obama, and pretty much the rest of the Democratic party, are a fascist political party. Now, that doesn’t mean that they’re the racist, genocidal fascists the nazi party was, but it does mean that they use similar political tactics that other fascists, including, but not limited to, the nazis, used to gain power democratically. It also doesn’t mean that Obama has any intention of seizing power as a tyrant, the way some other fascists throughout history have. However, just as with all officials given any power, he does bear watching, and opposing whenever he tries to step out of line.

Only about 20% of grad students are landing jobs.

I myself graduated in January and only landed a job this past week. At least the engineers such as myself can get a steady supply of interviews though.

Victor Davis Hanson summarizes the current state of the Ministry Of Truth media we’ve been seeing, especially since Obama got elected.

Do you also notice how there’s increasingly little difference between the Democratic party and the major media outlets?

Over at RealClearMarkets.

While he gets the basic idea of a flat tax vs. a consumption tax correct, there are a couple of things about the FairTax specifically that get left unsaid. View full article »

Let’s continue the practice of having the successful and prudent pay off the unsuccessful and impulsive to the credit card industry. It seems like just the shot in the foot our economy needs right now.

You can kiss goodbye to all of the money the government lent to GM, and to the money they’re planning on lending giving in the near future, as well.

Gateway is pointing out that the FEC has finally dismissed allegations that Palin’s wardrobe for the campaign was an improper use of funds.

They have yet to do any sort of audit whatsoever of Obama’s massive anonymous fundraising from anywhere in the world.

An emissions tax that will raise the cost of new vehicles by $1300, and a cap and trade plan that will cost our economy $7,000,000,000,000 over the next 19 years. $7 Trillion dollars. How is that a good idea? How is it not one of the worst ideas we’ve ever had?

First of all, global warming is an effect that if it exists (there’s a decent chance of that) likely isn’t caused by humans, and even if it is, by the worst case estimates of the IPCC(the actual scientists who split the Nobel with Gore) it won’t have any noticeable effect for several hundred years. And that study was since shown to be overly aggressive in its predictions.

Secondly, every dollar we waste trying to fight global warming is a dollar we’re not spending elsewhere. If we’re going to just be giving money away from our economy, it’s much more worth it to fight things like malaria, or for clean water and such. Those sorts of efforts literally give the world back about $7 dollars in the next 50 years for every dollar invested, rather than taking hundreds of years to even break even on the investment. And they save lives immediately.

Thirdly, the only people who have ever effectively done anything for the environment have done so from a position of wealth. If you’re still struggling for a reasonable standard of living, you just don’t have the time or money to care about the environment. Slowing down the economy is the exact worst thing you can do for the environment, as it means there’s a lot less money to go around investing in the fantastic ideas such as hydrogen power or electric cars that are going to do amazing things for the environment in the long run. Do you really think that any of those ideas – which everyone insists are going to take 5-10 years of development before they’re practical enough to go mainstream – will develop any faster if the economy stays in a rut? No! The fastest way to develop our technology is to have enough money that venture capitalists can afford to throw money away at interesting ideas in the hopes that some of them will make it big.

In short, everyone who is fighting for carbon taxes, cap-and-trade, and pretty much every other economy limiting economic legislation is not only fighting against the environment, but they’re fighting against the economy, and for the deaths throughout the developing world of everyone who’s suffering from basic conditions we in the first world got under control long ago.

Soak the Rich, Lose the Rich. Notice how the primary discussion is just about state taxes, and how states with higher taxes are doing worse. Think about the percentage of your taxes that are federal vs. state: you pay way more in federal taxes. Do you really think that these same principles don’t apply on a country level as well? Why the heck are we still raising taxes?

Air Traffic Control.

And note the hypocrisy of the current debate regarding emissions and cap and trade when you consider that.

One of Obama’s top advisors suggests naming the Obama family dog “Miss California”. And yet she stated the EXACT SAME opinion on the issue as both Hillary Clinton and his highness Obama himself. Amazing.

Democrats are trying to change the prosecutor going after Edwards for allegedly funneling funds to the mistress he impregnated while his wife was undergoing treatment for terminal cancer. Talk about low.

Along the same lines, they’re trying to cover for Nancy Pelosi in her laughable attempt to cover herself by blaming the CIA.

Why the heck are other Democrats even trying to cover for such poor behavior? I can’t draw any good conclusions about the rest of the Democratic party for doing so.

If more people had known about the connections between Obama, Acorn, and Vote Fraud?

The New York Times certainly thought so, and so they buried the story. Just one more mark of shame they can add to their mantle. It’s quite crowded.

An interesting statistic that Neal Boortz points out. You have to wonder, if more of them were paying taxes in the first place if they’d be so willing for everyone to pay more taxes.

But well deserved. Victor Davis Hanson is summarizing the field day the media has had during these first 100 days with all the amazingly amatuer blunders committed.

Even though many of us on the right actually did think Bush’s debt was a problem, why are we really protesting Obama’s debt?

This may help you put the numbers in perspective.

Simply because living in a location with good public transportation is an expensive luxury.

As it has everywhere else, the universal coverage in Massachusetts has driven the waiting times for medical visits and procedures up tremendously. Hooray.

Reason has an essay on just how wasteful and unrealistic Obama’s energy plans are.

Ah, The Unions

The folks that brought you and their workers personal danger!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers