Unbelievable. That’s how disillusioning his policies have been. And he couldn’t even fill the house! Scott Brown, meanwhile, overflowed his facility.
Archive for January, 2010
Or at least, Firedoglake does.
Funny that the Boston Globe had an interactive map with the election results, even though we’re not yet even done voting today…
Over at Michelle Malkin’s. The Democrats are definitely pulling some stunts, but so far nothing looks too major, and conservatives and concerned citizenry are watching closely this time. Cheating does seem to be a major strategy they’re going for this year, so this is likely the first sign of things to come.
In this post I’m going to try to summarize all of the recent events and reasons that highlight who you should go out and vote for in Massachusetts.
First of all, it’s a tight election between Scott Brown and Martha Coakley. There is no viable third party to vote for, so pick one of those two only. Now, without further ado and in no particular order, here are all sorts of things to consider.
How has Martha Coakley done as an Attorney General? She’s pretty much been the voice of Democratic corruption in Massachusetts. She’s given illegal immigration quiet support, been against even considering new evidence to free the innocent – even horrifying accusations that have absolutely destroyed innocent families. At the same time she’s cut deals and virtually just let the most horrific of crimes go, and that’s not even the end of things Democrats don’t want you to remember.
Martha Coakley is dangerously delusional on terrorism, thinking that there are no terrorists in Afghanistan. She uses that excuse to claim we can just pull out, while we’re still at war there.
The Democrats are planning on holding off swearing in a legitimately elected representative (Scott Brown) until they can hold their healthcare vote with the guy the appointed without the people’s vote. And if they can’t hold it off long enough, they’ll just ram healthcare through with 51 Senators. How does that make you feel about “representative” government?
Martha Coakley and the Democrats that she’s working with (Heck, the violence was from an Obama appointee), have no scruples about electoral violence and punishing dissent. She has no qualms about using public funds illegally to support her campaign – even though the union members she’s paying for support are planning to personally vote for Brown! And she’s the one who’s supposed to go after perpetrators of crimes! Heck, there aren’t enough lawyers to go after all the ethics complaints the Brown team has against Coakley and the Dems. UPS is in line to sue her as well.
She’s yet another Democrat who somehow failed to disclose all her finances until just now. She’ll get along great with Obama’s cabinet.
She thinks we need to get taxes higher – but doesn’t like people knowing she thinks that.
She thinks Catholics shouldn’t work in emergency rooms because they oppose abortion. And her attitude suggests quite a bit more condescension in that area.
She just can’t seem to keep her foot out of her mouth. Who will she insult next? Her latest and greatest may be agreeing with Al Qaeda that the World Trade Center represented American greed. Remember, a gaffe is when a politician says what they mean.
Her campaign is pretty much based entirely around smears.
Even the cops and unions who work most closely with Coakley are endorsing Scott Brown.
Democrats even admit they’ll cheat to keep a Republican out. They think it’s their seat, not the people’s seat.
Scott Brown just might win. He’s actually up in the polls, and his voters are unbelievably motivated.
Just not for China. Google is no longer censoring their search results, and is even considering pulling out of China. And it’s prompting even the U.S. government to pressure China to account for their actions, and exposing other instances of Chinese misbehavior. And even if Google does pull out of China, that may not be such a bad thing either.
Not that this will surprise anyone, but the past week highlighted, once again, the amazing double standards on race and racism the Democrats, media, and black community have. Harry Reid said something that would be absolutely inexcusable had a conservative said it (or even used the word) – and everyone just forgave him for it, from Obama to the NAACP.
Once again, being a Democrat is a forgive-all pass.
You didn’t think that Democrats would write a bill as big as the health care bill without having to put in several big checks to their favorite interest groups, did you?
There’s a lot of them, but right now lets look at transparency and openness. How many times did Obama promise we would see all of the debate on CSpan? And now everything is being done behind closed doors, and no, we won’t discuss a thing. And what about the amendments that Republicans put in during what debate process we did have? Those are out.
Obama’s abortion promises concerning health care? Also broken.
What about not raising taxes? Yup, the health care bill breaks that promise.
That’s the appropriate way to describe Code Pink, as you can see again and again.
And remember, this is an organization that Obama meets with, right after they’ve been meeting with terrorists and inviting them to help cleanse the U.S.!
A new piece of archaeological evidence can claim to be the world’s oldest recording of scripture. 10th century B.C. Wow.
Oh look, now that Obama has been elected the NIE is revising their estimate of Iran to say that it IS producing nuclear weapons.
Every leftist blogger, reporter, and Democrat who pointed to that report as God’s own truth now owes the world an apology.
Instapundit and others are musing that computers should ship with programming environments. Many actually do, especially OS X. And there are even languages/environments meant to be easy to use and learn, such as squeak, which coincidentally ships with the OLPC program – since one of the main OLPC guys is one of the main squeak guys.
From NASA. It just keeps on coming.
Democrat controlled New Jersey voted down gay marriage. Do you think the gay community will use their latest intimidation tactics against Democrats? And is the press all over it?
