There are constant calls in the west to find the “root causes” of terrorism, and try and address them. Oh, it must be poverty, or illiteracy, or unemployment. These views are trivially proved wrong simply by looking at the demographics of the worst terrorists – they’re so often well educated, financially successful individuals.
Unfortunately, jihadist terrorism (like so many of Islam’s problems) is not some isolated problem to a few fringe religious extremists, as so many wish to pretend. It never was. Jihad and religious world dominance is a significant goal of mainstream Islam. And until we recognize and confront the problem, it will only get worse.How can I say that mainstream Islam is the problem? Simple: while it is true that only a small number of Muslims are willing to personally commit jihad, mainstream Muslim organization after organization constantly support terrorism around the world. And even many of the ones who don’t support terror still pursue Islamic dominance outside of jihad – through our courts, through government infiltration, through intimidation, through radical education, and through claims of political correctness and tolerance being used to suppress free speech. These softer sort of approaches to Islamic dominance is precisely why incidents like the ground zero mosque must be confronted, and why they are offensive – especially when they seek taxpayer funding with a wry smile.
The plain fact is that the atrocities against women, all other religions and ideologies, the fatwas and bounties, the antisemitism and torture – they’re a product of the culture, and not isolated incidents. I’ve frankly stopped blogging on most of the honor killings, drive by shootings, and just atrocious behavior that happens here in western countries, because they’re so frequent. The mainstream Muslim community does not stand up and condemn this behavior – instead they always deflect about Israel, or other excuses.
What needs to be done? Islam must be reformed, however little they wish it. Muslims need to recognize that they have problems within their own culture, and need to shame them out. Some do – and there are also tolerant branches of Islam that are willing to stand up and do what is right. All of these need to be supported and propped up, while we recognize and call out the jihadist elements. In other words, the left’s current tactic of trying to disregard terrorists as merely criminals (whom they can’t prosecute), and their willingness to blindly look at terrorist elements as okay or even good simply because their true enemies (conservatives, of course) have called these organizations out is exactly wrong.










There is no such thing as ‘offensive Jihad’. What these (so-called) ‘Muslims’ are doing is just trying to achieve their own interests by mutilating religion and taking advantage of the masses’ ignorance.
Islam doesn’t teach to be offensive. I have discussed this in detail on my blog
http://dinopak.wordpress.com/tag/religion-of-peace/
http://dinopak.wordpress.com/tag/shariah-law/
So I actually agree with your statements, although I would bicker a bit about your language. Shariah and Wahabbism definitely are the main problems in Islamic culture today. Are those the true Islam or not? I don’t know, I’m not a Muslim theologist.
I do not that the problems that Shariah and Wahabbism have – a hunger for power, sexism, and all of that are problems that have been in Islamic culture for a long time, practically since its founding. Don’t get me wrong – there have definitely been parallel elements in Christian cultures at times throughout history, but right now it is Islamic cultures that are at war in nearly half the world.
There are definitely more moderate elements in Islamic culture. Unfortunately, the main organizations all seem to be sponsored by the Saudis, and just as radical.
Shariah isn’t a problem at all. During the time of the Prophet (peace be upon him) all the tribes of different beliefs lived together in harmony.
Then during the reign of Saladin, Jerusalem was a Utopia for people of every religion who lived there. Shariah is totally misinterpreted (due to the fact that Qura’an itself is misinterpreted).
Wahabism is a sect of Islam just like Christians have Orthodox Christian Evangelical Christians etc. Wahabism is a product of Arabia, specifically of Saud (who conquered Arabia), who used his version of Islam to gather the masses into his Kingdom.
While Arabs claim they have ‘perfect’ Islam within their borders they are ignorant of the fact that Monarchy is strictly denounced in Islam.
You should go through the posts I made about Islam it will increase your knowledge about it.
I did. I’m sorry, but even if your ideal Shariah state is nothing similar to today’s Shariah states, I would not want to live in it. You point to the time of Saladin as a golden age, but even the symbolic dominance that Shariah demands from other religions would rankle, among other things. I doubt that any most benevolent system that instituted even a symbolic dhimmi system would not be immensely subject to corruption of that system. In the same way that socialist systems always fail because it is impossible to set up a benevolent system and keep it filled with uncorrupt officials, I firmly believe it is impossible to set up and keep pure a benevolent dhimmi system.
taosit, not long ago we saw the crisis over capitalism. You are right, in today’s world Shariah cannot be implemented that is why I wrote
It is impossible in today’s world to build up a society that could match Medina or Jerusalem at that time. Hence, it is pointless to exhaust one’s energy demanding shariah law anywhere.