Journalistic idiocy and bias at it’s best.
Heh: You know who else doesn’t have a degree in economics? Barack Obama.
Journalistic idiocy and bias at it’s best.
Heh: You know who else doesn’t have a degree in economics? Barack Obama.
Or, look for massive social development problems from these classes starting in about 10 years…
It makes no sense to me that the kum-ba-ya crowd constantly ignores child psychologists and all common sense by trying to assert that there are no differences between the genders. Six-year old understandings of biology and sex are more intelligent.
There’s an interesting article here about how much freer private citizens are (in most states) to defend themselves than our troops are.
While our troops are definitely too restricted right now, I think we always want our troops more restricted than private citizens: We’re giving them training and equipment for them to represent us and project our power abroad, and everything they do does have consequences outside of just two individuals fighting.
Our troops need to be able to effectively project their force and defend themselves, and the more effectively they’re allowed to do that, the less they will have to. But the flip-side is that destroying mosques, or even much less symbolic buildings, or many of the other things that soldiers could do to more effectively defend themselves can hurt the very cause they’re trying to achieve. It’s a careful balance to strive for.
Snakehead. Let’s eat!
From what I know, snakeheads are pretty monstrous as an invasive species, too.
Looking at eminent domain abuse in Brooklyn. Bonus: look at all the unions involved.
Indeed. Agricultural subsidies just need to be killed, as simple as that.
Lessons learned from Haiti. The problem isn’t capitalism, the problem is government, of course.
Imagine that. Not only did the world not end, but things are already looking up for pretty much everyone, except for the union leeches and their Democrat cronies.
What do you know, the wealthy over there are also thinking about moving elsewhere because of taxes. It’s almost like it’s some easy-to-identify economic principle or something.
Regardless of what Anthony Bourdain says: your money will go to support a brutal regime that people are desperately, desperately trying to get away from.
For union members, the answer is always “more”, even though they’re already earning more than their private counterparts.
One report seems to think so, and begs an investigation into the taxpayer funded organization.
And yet the pro-abortion crowd will defend not only the taxpayer funding, but the wrongdoing, just because they’re so set on being against whatever the pro-life crowd is for.
The economic stories about the state surpluses didn’t contain the word “unexpected”!
Of course, the stories don’t mention which party is actually in charge of each of the states that ran those surpluses.
Palin. Note that the bureaucrats running things there seem fine with most Democrat names.