Category: Capitalism and Economics
Because employers are adding jobs, but reducing hours – equivalent to 500,000 jobs lost.
But only by ditching the unions. Which is about what I thought would happen.
Hey, the first order approximation of what’s actually environmentally friendly is what makes the most economic sense.
Maybe. Let’s see if they’re any better at extrapolating themselves from it than any other country.
Fedex, Home Depot, Subway…and it’s because of the regulation and tax environment.
The productivity gains she’s touting weren’t among the unskilled workers making minimum wage. So no, they shouldn’t be earning $22 an hour.
No surprise: remove the graft and messed up government accounting. But the goal of the sequester to Democrats is to make the cuts as painful as possible to the public to preserve the bureaucracy and graft.
No surprise. Is there anything it can’t do?









