There’s a lot of inflammatory information coming out the past several days with the latest hearings, but of course you wouldn’t know that if you’re watching MSNBC or CNN – who are absolutely trying to cover it up. Pro-censorship journalists, need I say more? Imagine the difference if Bush was president. CBS is actually doing a fairly good job though, having published some pretty explosive material.
The first thing that’s been hammered by witness after witness is that the story that the administration fed to the victims’ families and the people of the U.S. is that Benghazi absolutely was not about a YouTube video – and everyone involved knew it, and chose to lie to the American people, for the sake of political power. And remember, it’s not the crime, but the coverup.
The second horrendous atrocity we’ve discovered is that not only were there multiple requests for security and multiple requests for help (which Hillary lied under oath about), but help was nearby, and given multiple orders to stand down. And those stand down orders had to trickle down from someone high up – either AFRICOM, Hillary, or Obama himself. And then there was the bureaucratic incompetence - which was exacerbated by Hillary herself.
And the last major thing we’ve gotten to see is how Democrats react in trying to protect Obama and Hillary. There are bizarre myths that Obama did call in special forces, accusations that Republicans are merely trying to politicize the issue, Democrat attacks against whistleblowers, and claims that we shouldn’t care because, “death is part of life”, the usual stonewalling, and, worst of all, witness/whistleblower attempts at intimidation and bribery, straight from Hillary Clinton and the White House – intimidation that’s likely stopped at least two people from testifying.
Unlike the Tsarnaev brothers.
Well, that’s certainly how the left treats it.
This is a person who deliberately killed people. There is no room for him as a Muslim.
Excellent. More of this, please, until the radical elements of Islam really are on the fringe, around the world.
On full display once again. Democrats and liberals are once again trying to minimize or deny the radical Islamic causes of terrorism such as the Boston Marathon bombing. As always, they think it must be about race, and how racist conservatives are towards this religion(especially when the attacks are carried out by Caucasians, right?). The actual cause of the terrorism is, of course, very easy to understand – the terrorists themselves tell us, along with just about everyone else – whether Liberals like it or not, radical Islamists are at war with us. But that doesn’t fit with the left’s fight to protect the rest of the world from the evils of their true enemies, conservatives.
Hence the deliberate self-stupidity. And this line was great:
“The Boston Bombers Were Muslim: So?” Before taking a close look at Ms. Garber’s article, let’s advise The Atlantic not to put away that headline. It could come in handy so often. “The Cole Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The Embassy Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The First World Trade Center Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The September 11 Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The Madrid Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The London Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The Shoebomber Was Muslim: So?” The Underwear Bomber Was Muslim: So?” “The Fort Hood Shooter Was Muslim: So?” “The Beslan Child-Murderers Were Muslim: So?” “The Times Square Bomber Was Muslim: So?”
They were going to use the trains for something, but details haven’t been too forthcoming.
If the Democrats around me in Massachusetts have taught me anything, it’s that we have to avoid rushing to a conclusion as to the motive.
That Islam was involved.
The insanity of the multiculturalist viewpoint is on full display.
And yet again we’ve got a radical liberal Democrat terrorist. Despite all liberal hopes that once, just once, they would find a terrorist who’s a conservative that they could blame for everything they dislike.
Like so many of the rest of the “anti-war” crowd, she wasn’t anti-war, she was on the other side.