Latest Entries »
A very muddled situation, caused almost entirely by Obama’s efforts to bring “moral clarity” to what we’re doing in the middle east.
So yes, the Obama administration made it a priority to release, without congressional approval, 5 Taliban from Gitmo in exchange for one guy who’s likely a traitor and got 6 of his fellow soldiers killed. Without trying to free anyone else, and while another fellow soldier rotted in a Mexican prison for a trumped up charge. And then they attacked anyone who dared to question Bergdahl’s honor.
Even so, I wouldn’t hold my breath. As you see with the V for Vendetta fans, usually the solution proposed is their fascism, rather than the other guy’s.
The Syrian regime seems to now be using them regularly. They’ve figured out how weak our president really is.
By the way, I think that Google has every right to do this. I just think it’s worth pointing out that you can’t trust Google to be absolutely neutral on a topic, anymore than anyone else.
Hmm. “Former member of a notorious domestic terrorist group”. So what are the chances that it wasn’t Bill Ayers or some other radical leftist?
Why was Netanyahu’s election a loss for Obama? Because Obama sent his own campaign advisors to Israel to help Netanyahu’s opposition, and spent U.S. taxpayer dollars to do so. Which tells you just how much of a lie the opposition to Netanyahu’s congressional speech (based on “not interfering with the Israeli election”) was. Oh, and the Israelis know it.
Now, of course, Obama is behaving in his usual graceless way. He’s taken days to congratulate Netanyahu (whilst being shown up yet again by the House) and only done so in a backhanded manner, when he promptly congratulated others such as Putin. He’s also announced policy moves to basically punish Israel for their choice, changing U.S. strategy towards Israel. Oh, and Netanyahu’s recent tack to the right was driven by Obama.
Of course. As always, the only thing they have is attack politics that appeal to victimization indulgence, and the only thing they can do on that front is to constantly double down on their ever-more apparently false claims.
Here’s the key bit of law he quotes:
(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
Gee, more stimulus dollars going to “green” projects that line Democrat pockets. Where have we heard this before?