Latest Entries »
Someone should write about the detrimental effects on society when politicians think they’re above the law.
Like SpaceX, they’re 3D printing their parts. Their additional twists are carbon fiber rocket bodies and electric turbopumps.
It’s definitely an interesting question. I think the answer is yes. I would note, however, that it’s also a separate question than the ones about marriage – which is an official state recognition of a certain status, very different from the question of whether the state should prohibit something.
They were not the immigrants she claims they were in her stories.
And guns should be illegal, except for the armed guards that all of the rich politicians protect themselves with.
Democrats just want higher taxes to punish their enemies.
Just a reminder about what the law says:
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
It’s time for anyone who claims the problem is “religious extremism” and not “islamic extremism” to put up or shut up. He’ll put $100 forward for every Christian fundamentalist killing this year, and you put $1 forward for every Islamic killing, and whoever ends up putting forward more money has to give all that money to a charity of the winner’s choice.
Nice. I may try and make the same bet with some people.